My friend Katrina Ryan helped me make an Electronic Press Kit. Here it is!

And here's the direct link:
https://spark.adobe.com/page/NTiMY46FjDcPb/

A lot has been written about the influence of partisanship in the impeachment of Donald Trump. Here are three examples:

• "Tracing the Roots of a Partisan Impeachment" from NPR
• "The Breach Widens as Congress Nears a Partisan Impeachment" from the New York Times
• "Clinton Official Laments Partisanship Impeachment Divide" from Newsweek
• "Impeachment is Partisan Because Republicans Changed their Minds" from New York Magazine.

On and on it goes. I don't have anything to add there.

But I can say this: watching it all unfold has filled me with melancholy​.

Trump is indefensible, and he's dragged his colleagues to childish levels in order to maintain his hold on power. I don't remember politicians, Republicans or Democrats, consistently making such bad arguments in the George W. Bush era, in the Obama era, in any other political context. He's dumbed down his entire party; they sound childish.

And this makes me sad because I want adults, I want political leaders, to speak with clarity and conviction, not in defense of somebody who isn't worth defending. Trump is clearly a mess; nobody has created this much chaos in his term in Office. He needs to go. The letter proves it. And somehow, he continues to drag his entire party with him, as well as his base. What a sad state of affairs. 

I don't want to shame any politicians; I do not believe shame is an effective long-term tool here. But I do wish some of them would look at the language they're using and admit they wouldn't use such childish arguments in other political contexts. The silliness of the "Trying to take back the 2016 election" arguments would not be tolerated elsewhere.

Of course, there are checks and balances that did not work, that brought us here:

• The Republicans let Trump stay on the ballot for their nomination.
• The Republicans did not shoot Trump's candidacy die with the "Grab them by the p****" tape.

But even so, there's a deeper problem, and it's problem here in Canada too: First-past-the-post. FPTP, where the winner gains a seat and everyone else is completely ignored, does not bode well in such a partisan climate. It breeds strategic voting; it breeds cynicism and lack of participation in elections; it makes significant minorities essentially voiceless in government; it breeds partisanship and all-or-nothing thinking; it leads to majority governments with a minority of the electorate's support.

I don't care what system we choose for Proportional Representation, but we need it. The FPTP system has bought us Brexit, Trump, and even Trudeau's somewhat inexplicable maintenance of power here in Canada. First-past-the-post will continue to amalgamate power in the hands of a select oligarchy.

What I fear, though, is that FPTP will breed kakistocarcy, "a system of government that is run by the worst, least qualified, and/or most unscrupulous citizens." As long as those in power see no threat to it, crapshoot leaders, like Donald Trump, will still have access to power, we will continue to see decisions made by arbitrary referendums, like Brexit, and we will continue to have to settle with semi-mediocre leaders like Trudeau. People with real leadership potential will avoid such systems, since they hope to maintain their integrity; unscrupulous opportunists, like Mitch McConnell, will maintain their hold, knowing that a proportional mandate would jeopardize their lazy grip to power.

It should have happened a long time ago. We're reaping the consequences now. 

We need First-Past-The-Post to go the way of the British Empire that propogated it.

I've read a lot of articles over the last few years about why fewer people buy cameras. This one, which I read today, seems the most concise: "Real reasons why the camera market is shrinking" by Robin Wong. His takes affirm my own inferences: the market for cameras stagnated with their affordability and ubiquity, and they lost their purpose to the everyday user. Wong writes,

Fair enough. Photography can;t go much further than it already has. Photographers can make any image we want with older equipment. The market for new equipment no longer needs to exist.

I'm not a professional photographer. I like my cameras and I like shooting film, but I'm not being paid for it; I'm a hobbyist and I don't know if I'd want to pursue the craft beyond the level of hobby. However, last week a trade publication approached me to do a local shoot. Although I didn't "get" the shoot, it lead me down the rabbit-hole to upgrade my DSLR for times when I'm approached for gigs like that. In my search for an upgrade, it became abundantly clear almost immediately that I didn't need to get a super-duper, brand-new camera; there were plenty of people selling decade-old cameras with more features than I would ever need, and more megapixels than I'd ever need. The newest cameras seemed redundant and unnecessarily expensive.

For my casual hobby-work, I enjoy using older cameras. That's part of the joy of it for me. Lately, I've found joy in buying a  cheap used camera, shooting a roll or two with it, and then selling the camera again. If I've been asked to do something slightly more professional, I have a couple cameras that I can use on a more trustworkty basis, but I've never had to use a really-fast shutter speed, so what I already own has always been enough. If I need crisp medium format photos, I have the Mamiya C3 and the Kowa Six; if I need crisp 35mm photos, I have the Konica T3 and T4 and a slew of lenses for them; if I need something more lo-fi, I have the classic Lomography cameras, or the Konica S2, and a bunch of other little cameras; I have a bunch of Cokin filters for added fun and effects. And for my purposes, that's ok. 

But I do find it a little sad, even though it doesn't affect me, that the camera market has diminished as much as it has. As a fan of photography, I want people taking photos. And yet, admittedly, there isn't much "new" that photographers can do with the medium. Myself included.

A couple days ago, my girlfriend posted a professional portrait that she had done for her. It was a really excellent photo. In the photo, I could see the lighting setup in the reflection on her cornea: two softboxes, much like a school photo. And I was a little envious of this. But then again, if I didn't have all these pros to compare with, I'd probably be very happy with what I'm doing. I have enough as it is and I'm still improving.

And I guess that's a good place to be, no matter what's happening to the "industry."

I spent some time on Saturday trying to record some guitar parts. It was mentally painful and difficult and I haven't dared to listen to them yet. But I broke that ice and that's important, an accomplishment in and of itself.

My goal for this recording is simple: I want to make a product that reflects the style I play at my regular-ish gigs. Usually I've recorded my songs as big, full-band arrangements, but I want to make simple recordings that people can buy and think, "This sounds like what I what I just heard."

This is the first time I've tried to record at all for a long time. Demos that I started in 2012 stalled in 2014 or so as my life took some turns. The songs started to feel ridiculous: they were loud, overwrought, and just didn't sound right. They sounded like I was trying too hard, which was precisely what I was doing. I haven't listened to those demos for a long time; I can't really hear them anymore.

So I'm starting over with a minimalist approach. Instead of starting with the drum machine like I have in the past, I'm going to start with guitars, hoping to get some natural percussion put in at a later date, once the guitar, bass, and vocal bedrock is done. I feel like starting from a more natural approach—strings rather than drum machines—will make my recordings appear more balanced, so they don't come-off as compressed rock arrangements.

But it's hard. My motivation is next to nil. I feel like I have a bit of a time-crunch, but I don't feel like I have anything invested. When recording, I'm finding it hard to know which mistakes are worth messing with and when they're worth working with in post. I'm just not feeling it at all. I seem to think all my songs are terrible; I don't seem to be able to see an audience for them. I keep having critical comments from myself and others running through my head and I can't seem to shake the sense of futility in it all. I feel like they're already latently unfinished.

This is common Jeffrey-stuff, though: I never feel like my "work" is up to snuff. It always seems hackneyed and artificial. And I've never got my creations done to the degree that I want to. My songs feel weird; my photos seem uninspired. But I just need to keep pressing on.

This is why it's important to have a producer or an agent, someone to light a fire under your butt and tell you that you need to get things done. It always appears that there are all these people self-motivated people who seem to be driven enough to put their stuff out there without someone pushing them, but there's a good chance that a bunch of those people have agents and producers. They just have to get it out there, with help from professionals.

But I feel like I don't have the ego needed for that sort of self-motivation, at least anymore. Years and years of middle-class clock-plugging seems to have zapped a lot of my creative oomph. 

So I keep slogging. And hopefully some good-sounding music will come out of it.

I appreciate today's editorial from The Globe and Mail about our rather lacklustre election results. 

It's going to be quite the tightrope, yes, and Trudeau admitted as much today (although I can't quite find a link of the conference I heard about). 

I think Trudeau's tendency to try to "play both sides" has made him somebody nobody is happy with. But I also believe he was initially elected for promises he never intended to keep, since he did not expect to win the election five years ago. I don't find him incompetent for his promises made when he expected to lose. But the whole talking-out-both-sides-of-your-mouth habit discourages me.

I tend to like minority governments. The necessity to compromise and team-up tends to work well for policy. However, I haven't seen much in Trudeau that makes me think he's a capable compromiser, nor have we seen anything like that from the main national balance-of-power party, the NDP.

I have no predictions.